Why the Right Recording Studio Gear Makes Records Sound Different

There’s a reason certain records have a quality you can’t quite name. A weight to the vocal. A glue across the mix. A warmth that feels less like a sound and more like a memory.

Most of the time, it isn’t the song or the engineer doing it on their own — it’s the equipment in the signal path. And not all equipment is equal.

At 123 Studios, our recording studio in London, we don’t care whether a piece of gear was built in 1960 or last year. We care whether it’s the best version of that tool. Sometimes that means an irreplaceable vintage Neumann. Sometimes it means a modern unit built by someone who spent decades perfecting it. The point is to use the right one — not the cheapest, not the trendiest, and not whatever a plugin company is selling that month.

Here’s what’s in the room, and why it matters when you’re choosing where to make a record.

The UnFairchild UFC-6: a modern compressor built to a vintage standard

Our UnFairchild UFC-6 was designed by the Grammy-winning producer Eric Valentine. It uses the same valve and transformer count as the original Fairchild 670 — 20 valves and 14 transformers per channel — built to the same circuit philosophy that made the original the secret weapon on Beatles records at Abbey Road.

What Valentine added is what the original always lacked: variable attack and release controls. The original 670 had fixed time constants, which is part of what gives it its character but also limits where it works. The UFC-6 keeps the unmistakable sound and adds the flexibility to use it on almost anything — vocals, drum bus, full mix, guitars.

You can run a signal through it without touching the controls and it still sounds better on the way out — fatter, rounder, alive in a way digital can’t fake.

Vintage vocal microphones: Neumann U47, M49 and Telefunken 251E

A Neumann U47, a Neumann M49, a Telefunken 251E. These are the microphones you’ve heard your whole life without knowing it — Sinatra, Ella, Bowie, every classic vocal sound from the last seventy years went through one of them.

They aren’t just “good mics.” They have a midrange presence and a top-end air that modern microphones, however well-designed, simply don’t replicate. The capsules and tubes and transformers in these things are irreplaceable, and the sound is irreplaceable with them.

This is one of the few cases where only the original will do. Singing into a U47 is different from singing into a £2,000 modern condenser. The singer hears it. So does the listener.

A 3M M79 tape machine with verifiable provenance

Our 3M M79 was bought new by Pete Townshend’s Eel Pie Studios in Twickenham in January 1974. We have the original warranty card. It has been recording professional sessions for over fifty years, and it still does.

What tape does to a signal is hard to put into words. It compresses peaks gently. It rolls off the very top in a way that feels musical rather than dull. It adds harmonic content — saturation — that the ear reads as warmth and depth.

Every classic record you love sounds the way it does partly because it was committed to tape at some point. We can still do that here, in Peckham, today.

An SSL E-Series console: the desk that mixed your record collection

A 6024 E-Series console with the original brown knob EQ. The desk that mixed most of the records you grew up on, from the late seventies onwards.

Our console was installed by George Gilbert, formerly of SSL — one of the most experienced SSL service engineers in the country. As he puts it, the classic SSL E-Series was the Rolls Royce of consoles in its day: SSL would meticulously source the best components available to build them, with no compromises. They are responsible for mixing more hit records than any other console in history.

If you know SSL consoles, the EQ choice matters. The later black knob version is the more famous one in popular shorthand, but the brown knob — the original 02 EQ — is what a lot of serious engineers actually prefer. It’s smoother, more musical, more forgiving on vocals and full mixes. It’s the EQ on a huge proportion of the records that defined the sound of the late seventies and early eighties, and it has a character that engineers chase in plugin form and never quite catch.

The summing has a depth and width that an in-the-box mix can approach but rarely matches.

When people search for a south London recording studio with an SSL, this is what they’re looking for.

Pulse Techniques Pultec EQs and a Teletronix LA-2A

Four Pulse Techniques Pultec EQs and a Universal Audio Teletronix LA-2A. Both are modern, and both are as good as the originals — arguably better, because they’re built to original spec without fifty years of drift.

The Pultecs were built by Steve Jackson, who spent years perfecting them and is widely considered to make the best Pultecs you can buy today. They do something to low end that no other EQ does — a trick of phase and saturation that makes a kick or a bass guitar feel bigger without getting muddy.

The LA-2A is the gentlest, most musical compressor ever made, and it’s been on more hit vocals than any other single piece of equipment. The licensed Teletronix reissue is faithful enough that the difference between it and an original isn’t worth chasing.

These are examples of where the modern version is the right choice, not a compromise.

Vintage Neve preamps: 31102 and 1272

Class-A, transformer-coupled, built when build quality wasn’t a marketing line. They give drums a thump and a sheen at the same time. They make guitars sit forward without effort. They’re the reason a lot of records from a lot of decades sound expensive.

Why “the best of each” matters more than “vintage”

There’s a tendency in studios to fetishise old equipment for its own sake — to treat anything pre-1980 as automatically better than anything made since. That isn’t quite right.

What’s actually true is that a lot of the best audio equipment ever made was built between the mid-1950s and the early 1980s, when manufacturers were trying to build the best possible version of something and have it last forever. A Neumann U47 was a precision instrument made to outlive the engineer who first plugged it in. An SSL console was a serious piece of British engineering. None of it was designed for a five-year product cycle. None of it was built to a price.

But it’s also true that some modern manufacturers — Eric Valentine, Steve Jackson at Pulse Techniques, Universal Audio for licensed Teletronix builds — are still making equipment to that standard. They’ve refused to accept that you can’t still build something with the same care, the same components and the same intent.

So the question isn’t vintage or modern. It’s is this the best version of this tool. Sometimes the answer is a 1960s Neumann. Sometimes it’s an UnFairchild built last year. Either way, it’s the right one for the job.

It’s the difference between a hand-built piece of furniture from a craftsman’s workshop and a flatpack that arrives in a box and starts to come apart in a year. One is made to last and the other is made to be replaced.

Modern music has gone the same way. Streaming compresses everything. Algorithms reward what’s quickest to make. Plugins are updated and superseded and forgotten about. The records made on serious equipment, by people who care, were made with the same care that went into the gear itself — and they’ve outlasted everything that came after.

Why this matters when choosing a London recording studio

Most studios today work in the box, with plugin emulations of all of the above. Plugins have got remarkably good. But emulation is still emulation. The actual transformers, the actual tubes, the actual tape — they do something to the signal at a physical level that software is approximating, not replicating.

When you record at 123, your sound is being shaped by the best version of each tool we could find — vintage where vintage is irreplaceable, modern where modern is the equal of the originals. The same components, the same standards, that shaped the records you fell in love with.

That’s not nostalgia. It’s just better equipment, used the way it was meant to be used.

It’s why we sound the way we do.


123 Studios is a recording studio in Peckham, south east London, built around the best of vintage and modern professional audio equipment. To book a session, get in touch or have a look at our recording, mixing and mastering services.

AI Mastering vs Human Mastering — What You Actually Get

# AI Mastering vs Human Mastering — What You Actually Get

AI mastering has gone from a curiosity to a standard option in the space of a few years. LANDR, eMastered, Ozone’s AI assistant, BandLab mastering, Masterchannel — the services are cheap, fast, and increasingly good. For a lot of artists, they’re the default first stop.

And that’s not a bad thing. AI mastering has made the process accessible to people who couldn’t previously afford it, which matters. But there’s a growing tendency to treat AI and human mastering as interchangeable, as if the only difference is price.

They’re not interchangeable. They do different jobs well, and it’s worth being clear about what each actually delivers before you decide which one your project needs.

This post isn’t a case against AI mastering. It’s an attempt to give you an honest framework for deciding when it’s the right tool and when it isn’t.

## What AI mastering actually does

Most AI mastering services work in broadly the same way. You upload a stereo mix. The algorithm analyses the spectral content, dynamic range and loudness of the file, compares it against a reference genre or style, and applies a chain of processing — EQ, compression, stereo imaging and limiting — to push the track towards a target.

Some services, like Ozone’s AI assistant, generate a starting point that a human engineer then refines. Others, like LANDR or eMastered, run fully automatically and deliver a finished file. Masterchannel and BandLab sit somewhere in between.

The output is generally loud, broadly balanced, and competitive with commercial releases in terms of level and frequency response. On a technical checklist — LUFS targets, true peak limits, basic spectral balance — most AI mastering services now pass.

That’s not nothing. For a long time, getting a track to a commercially competitive loudness without it sounding crushed or thin was genuinely difficult, and the AI tools have closed a real gap.

## Where AI mastering works well

There are specific situations where AI mastering is a sensible, pragmatic choice.

**Demos and works in progress.** If you’re sending rough mixes to a label, manager or collaborators, you don’t need a mastered track — you need something that sounds presentable. AI mastering is genuinely fine for this. It gets the track to a loudness and balance that won’t embarrass you on a phone speaker, and costs almost nothing.

**Budget projects with limited scope.** Not every project has a mastering budget, and not every project needs one. If you’re releasing a single song to streaming on a tight budget, AI mastering will probably get you to something acceptable.

**Reference material and sketches.** If you need a rough master to send alongside a mix to check how it’ll translate, AI tools can give you a useful approximation quickly.

**High-volume or fast-turnaround work.** Podcast episodes, background music libraries, social media content — contexts where the master just needs to be consistent and loud rather than artistically considered.

In these cases, AI mastering is doing exactly what it’s designed to do: deliver a technically competent result at low cost and high speed.

## Where AI mastering falls short

The limitations become clearer as the project gets more important.

**Genre nuance and artist intent.** AI mastering tools work by pattern-matching against reference material. They’re very good at making something sound like the genre it claims to be. They’re less good at recognising when a track is deliberately going against its genre — when the low end is meant to be unusual, when the vocal is meant to sit further back than the reference, when the mid-range is intentionally dense.

A human mastering engineer hears those decisions and supports them. An algorithm tends to flatten them towards the centre of whatever genre bucket it’s been asked to match.

**The mix/master relationship.** A good master responds to the specific mix it’s working with. It makes decisions about how much low end to tuck in, where the top end needs opening up, which elements need to come forward, which need to sit back. An AI tool makes those decisions based on averaged reference data, not on the actual creative decisions made in the mix.

If your mix is well-balanced to start with, AI can deliver something workable. If your mix has genuine character — quirks, deliberate imbalances, anything that makes it distinctive — AI will tend to normalise that character rather than enhance it.

**Tonal balance choices.** There’s no single correct tonal balance for a record. Two well-mastered albums from the same genre can sit very differently — one warmer, one brighter, one denser, one more open. Those choices are artistic, not technical. Human mastering engineers make them based on what the music is trying to say. AI tools make them based on what the music statistically resembles.

**Revision and context.** You can’t have a conversation with an AI mastering service about why the vocal feels too forward, or whether the low end works better tighter or rounder, or how the sequence of tracks flows across an album. You upload, you download, you live with the result. That’s fine for some work. For work where the details matter, it isn’t.

**Album-level coherence.** Mastering an album is not ten songs mastered separately and then assembled. It’s ten songs mastered in relation to each other — matched in tone and level, sequenced to flow, adjusted so that the journey across the record holds together. AI services master each track in isolation. They can match loudness across files, but they can’t make artistic decisions about how track three should sit in relation to track four.

## What human mastering actually brings

The value of a human mastering engineer is less about equipment — though the equipment matters — and more about judgement.

A mastering engineer listens to your mix with ears trained on thousands of other mixes. They hear what’s working, what isn’t, and what would improve with specific treatment. They make decisions informed by the genre, the artist’s intent, the likely playback contexts, and the comparison set your record will sit alongside.

The analogue side of the chain matters too. A genuine analogue mastering chain — valve equalisers, tube or transistor compressors, a tape machine — imparts a quality to audio that isn’t easily replicable in software. Not because digital processing is inferior, but because the nonlinearities of analogue circuitry add density, weight and a kind of glue that digital tools are still modelling rather than generating natively.

At 123 Studios, mastering runs through vintage analogue hardware including Pultec EQs, Fairchild and Unfairchild compressors, and — for tape mastering — a 3M M79 24-track machine. The chain is chosen for musicality, not for spec-sheet completeness.

But the hardware is the tool, not the answer. What matters is the person making the decisions about how the tool is used.

## The middle ground — hybrid approaches

The conversation doesn’t have to be binary. There are genuinely useful ways to combine AI tools with human mastering.

**AI for demos, human for release.** Use AI mastering to get demos and works-in-progress to a presentable state quickly and cheaply. When you’re actually releasing the record, move to human mastering. This is a sensible workflow for most working artists.

**AI as a starting reference.** Some engineers use AI tools to generate a reference version of a master, then work from that — either matching it, improving on it, or deliberately moving away from it. The AI output becomes a datapoint rather than a decision.

**Hybrid mastering chains.** A human engineer using software mastering alongside analogue gear, with AI assistants handling specific technical tasks (true peak limiting, loudness matching, simple EQ corrections) while the engineer makes the creative decisions. This is already standard practice in many mastering studios.

None of these approaches require abandoning AI tools. They require being clear about what the tools are good for and what they aren’t.

## How to decide which is right for your project

A few honest questions.

**Is this a release you’ll still care about in five years?** If yes, human mastering is almost certainly worth it. The cost difference between AI and human mastering becomes negligible when amortised over the life of a record you’re proud of.

**Does the mix have distinctive character?** If your mix has quirks, deliberate choices, or anything that sets it apart from the genre average, AI mastering will tend to smooth those out. Human mastering can preserve and enhance them.

**Is this an album, or tracks that need to sit together?** Album-level mastering benefits substantially from a human approach. Single-track releases can more easily use AI if budget is tight.

**How important is the revision process to you?** If you want to discuss, iterate, and refine the master, you need a human. AI services don’t do conversations.

**What’s the artistic weight of the project?** A demo to send to a booker is different from a record that’ll be reviewed, press-cycled and played live for years. Spend mastering budget where it matches the artistic stakes.

## Mastering at 123 Studios

Mastering at 123 Studios is built around the analogue chain — SSL console summing, Pultec EQs, Fairchild/Unfairchild compression, and optional tape mastering through a 3M M79 24-track with documented Eel Pie Studios provenance.

Albums and EPs are mastered with unlimited revisions. Singles include two free revisions. The pricing is deliberately competitive because the studio runs as a working production facility rather than a dedicated commercial mastering house — which means high-end equipment and experienced engineering at rates that make sense for independent artists.

– Singles: £60 analogue / £70 tape (two free revisions)
– Albums and EPs: £50 per track analogue / £60 per track tape (unlimited revisions)
– MFIT accredited

The mastering page covers the technical chain in more detail. For project-specific enquiries, the best route is email — include a link to the mixes and a brief description of the release.

brettshaw123@outlook.com

## Final thought

AI mastering isn’t a threat to human mastering. It’s a tool that works well for some jobs and less well for others. The honest framing is that they’re different services addressing different needs — not cheaper and more expensive versions of the same thing.

For demos, sketches, high-volume work and tight budgets, AI is a reasonable choice. For releases where the details matter, human mastering with a proper analogue chain still does something AI tools can’t — not because the algorithms aren’t clever, but because the decisions being made are artistic rather than statistical.

The best thing you can do is be clear about which kind of project you’re working on, and choose accordingly.

What to look for when booking a recording studio in London And Why Price Isn’t The Whole Story

If you’re an independent artist or band looking to book a recording studio in London, one of the first things you’ll notice is how hard it is to find clear pricing.
In most cases, you’re asked to fill out an enquiry form, wait for a reply, and only then find out the day rate. That process can make it difficult to quickly understand whether a studio fits your budget.
At 123 Studios, we take a different approach — our rates are published upfront, so you can make an informed decision before getting in touch.
But price transparency is only part of the story.
Because when it comes to recording studios, what you’re actually getting for that price matters far more than the number itself.

Why Price Doesn’t Tell You Much On Its Own
Studios can vary massively in what they offer — even at similar price points. Two rooms might both charge £500 a day, but one could have a world-class console, a full microphone locker, high-end outboard and an experienced engineer, while the other might be built around a much more modest setup.
That’s why comparing studios purely on price can be misleading. The real question is: what level of room, gear, and experience are you actually getting for your budget?

What 123 Studios Offers — And Why It’s Priced This Way
At 123 Studios, weekend and evening sessions start from £300 + VAT for a full day and £250 + VAT for a half day or evening. Backline is included, with no hidden extras.
For context, comparable London studios typically charge anywhere from £775 to over £3,000 + VAT per day — and those are exceptional rooms with world-class facilities. Their pricing reflects that.
What’s different about 123 Studios is how the room is maintained. Unlike studios built purely for hire, 123 operates as a working production and mixing facility — which means the gear is in constant use, properly maintained, and set up to a working producer’s standard. Weekend and evening sessions are available to independent artists at rates that reflect this. In other words: you’re accessing a high-end room without the overhead of a traditional commercial studio.

The Gear — What You’re Actually Working With
For artists who care about sound, the setup matters.
Console — A vintage SSL E-Series, the same class of desk used on countless major records over the last four decades.
Microphones — A full locker including Neumann U47, U67, ELAM 251, M49, FET47, KM84, U87, RCA/AEA 44 and more — the kind of mics typically reserved for top-tier sessions.
Outboard — Fairchild and Unfairchild compressors, 1176s, LA-2As, Distressors, API 2500, SSL bus compression, Pultecs, Chandler Curve Bender, Neve and API preamps.
Tape — Three tape machines, including a 3M M79 24-track, available for tracking or mastering.
Put simply, this is a signal chain you’d usually expect in rooms charging significantly higher rates.

The Engineer
The studio is built around the work of Brett Shaw, whose credits include Foals, Florence + The Machine, Clean Bandit and Daughter, along with multiple UK number one records.
Weekend and evening sessions are run by engineers selected by Brett — working in the same room, with the same setup and standards. Just as importantly, the focus isn’t only on equipment — it’s on creating an environment where artists can actually deliver their best performances.

What To Ask Before Booking Any Studio
Wherever you decide to record, it’s worth asking a few key questions upfront: what console do you use, and is it fully maintained? What microphones are available? Who will be engineering, and what are their credits? Is tape available, and is it included in the rate? What exactly does the day rate cover? Can I hear recordings made in this room?
Even if you don’t book with us, these questions will help you make a more informed decision — and avoid paying for something that doesn’t match your expectations.

Final Thought
There are some incredible studios in London at every level. The key is not just finding something within your budget — but understanding what that budget actually gets you.
If you’re looking to record in a high-end room without paying traditional London studio rates, 123 Studios offers a different way to access that level of quality.
Get in touch with a bit about your project, and we’ll let you know what’s possible.
Get in touch →

That’s the complete post. The only thing changed is the third paragraph under “What 123 Studios Offers — And Why It’s Priced This Way.” Everything else is identical to what’s live.

Recording a Band in London — Everything You Need to Know

# Recording a Band in London — Everything You Need to Know

Whether you’re booking your first proper studio session or you’ve done it before and want to make sure you’re getting it right this time, this guide covers the questions we get asked most often. No jargon, no upselling — just honest answers.

## How much does it cost to record a band in London?

It varies enormously depending on the studio and what’s included. At the lower end you’ll find rooms that hire out for £100–£200 a day, but these typically don’t include an engineer, and the gear on offer is basic.

A professional studio with a proper live room, quality microphones and a house engineer typically starts around £300–£400 a day. At 123 Studios in Peckham, full-day rates with an engineer start from £300 plus VAT — and that includes the full mic locker, SSL console, outboard, and backline. No hidden extras.

The important thing to compare isn’t the day rate in isolation — it’s what you’re actually getting for it.

## Do we need an engineer, or can we record ourselves?

Unless someone in your band has professional recording experience, you almost certainly want an engineer. Recording a full band live is a complex job — mic placement alone can make or break a drum sound, and getting the balance right between multiple sources in a room takes years of experience.

A good engineer also keeps the session moving, which matters when you’re paying by the day. They’ll know when a take is worth keeping, when something needs fixing, and how to get the best out of the room and the gear.

## What’s the difference between a junior and senior engineer?

A junior engineer will typically have several years of professional experience — they know their way around the desk, can set up quickly and competently, and will get you a great result. They’re the right choice for most straightforward recording sessions.

A senior engineer brings a deeper level of expertise — broader experience across genres, stronger instincts for arrangement and performance, and often a more significant credit list. If you’re working on something ambitious, or you want the person behind the desk to contribute creatively as well as technically, a senior engineer is worth the extra cost.

## How long does it take to record a band?

Honestly, it depends on what you want the end result to be.

If you are making demos to shop to labels or promoters, a tight band that has rehearsed properly can get a few songs tracked in a day. That is achievable and often perfectly sufficient for the purpose.

If you are recording a high quality single or EP that you are releasing properly, you will want to spend more time — not just on tracking, but allowing enough space for a good mix too. Rushing the mix because you have run out of budget is one of the most common mistakes bands make.

The variables that affect time most are often less obvious than you would expect. How much editing is needed after tracking? Are the performances tight enough to go straight to mix, or do drums need comping, tuning needs fixing, timing needs tightening? A band that plays immaculately will always get through a session faster than one that relies on fixing things afterwards.

Preparation is everything. Bands that arrive with locked arrangements, rehearsed parts and gear in good working order get significantly more done than those still making decisions in the room.

## What should we do before coming into the studio?

Rehearse the specific arrangements you want to record — not just the songs, but the exact versions. Know your tempos. If you’re recording to a click track, practise to one beforehand so it doesn’t throw you on the day.

Make sure your gear is in good order. Fresh strings, new drum heads if needed, and check that everything works properly before you arrive. Sorting a broken cable or a buzzing amp eats into expensive studio time.

Bring a rough recording of what you’re going for — even a phone demo helps the engineer understand what you’re aiming at before the session starts.

## What is a live room and why does it matter?

The live room is where the band plays. Its size, height, acoustic treatment and materials all directly affect how your recording sounds — before a single piece of outboard gear or plugin is involved.

A good live room gives you natural ambience, separation between instruments, and the kind of energy that makes a band sound like a band rather than a collection of individually recorded parts.

At 123, the live room has high ceilings, warm wooden walls, an adjustable ceiling cloud, interchangeable wall panels and an electronic Drumbrella — all of which allow the sound to be shifted from open and expansive to tight and focused depending on what the music needs. Backline is included at no extra cost.

## What’s the difference between recording to tape and recording digitally?

Digital recording captures audio with precision and gives you enormous flexibility in the edit — you can fix almost anything after the fact. It’s the standard for most modern sessions and there’s nothing wrong with it.

Tape recording captures audio to magnetic tape rather than a hard drive. The process adds a subtle harmonic saturation, warmth and natural compression that’s very difficult to replicate with plugins. It also tends to make bands play differently — knowing you can’t just fix it in the edit focuses the performance.

At 123, you can record fully to tape, fully digitally, or use the tape machines as analogue inserts within a digital session — running stems through the machine to get the character of tape without committing entirely. The studio has five tape machines, including a 3M 79 — the same model used on records by Fleetwood Mac, Led Zeppelin, the Beatles, Michael Jackson and many others.

## Do we need to bring our own instruments and backline?

You should bring your main instruments — guitars, basses, any specialist gear that defines your sound. Pedal boards, specific amps you rely on, anything personal to you.

At 123, backline is included at no additional cost — drums, amps and keys are available in the room. If you have a specific snare or cymbals you prefer, bring those. But you don’t need to hire or transport a full drum kit.

## How do we get the most out of a day’s recording?

Arrive on time, preferably a little early. Load in, get set up, and be ready to start recording within the first hour. The most expensive thing in a studio is wasted time.

Know your parts. Have a clear idea of what you want to achieve by the end of the day and communicate that to your engineer at the start of the session — they can help you plan the day realistically.

Take breaks when you need them, but keep momentum. Decision fatigue is real, and the best takes usually happen when the band is energised and focused rather than exhausted after eight hours in a room together.

## Where is 123 Studios and how do we get there?

123 Studios is based at Copeland Park, 133 Copeland Road, Peckham, London SE15 3SN — one minute’s walk from Peckham Rye Overground station. The studio is on the Overground network, fifteen minutes from Shoreditch High Street and well connected across South and East London. There is parking nearby and easy load-in access to the building.

To book a session or discuss your project, email [brettshaw123@outlook.com](mailto:brettshaw123@outlook.com).

Analogue Recording in London — Tape, Consoles and Why It Still Matters

Analogue recording in London isn’t nostalgia — it’s a deliberate creative choice.

Most artists working today understand digital recording inside out. The shift back towards tape and analogue hardware isn’t about rejecting that — it’s about choosing a different sound, workflow and mindset when the music calls for it.

At 123 Studios in Peckham, South East London, analogue recording sits alongside modern production, not in opposition to it.


What analogue recording actually means

Analogue recording is about capturing or processing sound through physical systems — magnetic tape, analogue consoles, compressors and equalisers — rather than keeping everything entirely in the box.

The difference isn’t just sonic. It changes how decisions get made in the room.

Tape naturally compresses transients, adds harmonic saturation and introduces a sense of density that’s difficult to replicate exactly with plugins. Not because digital tools are lacking, but because they’re modelling something that happens physically in the medium — the relationship between the magnetic oxide on the tape and the record head, the way the machine responds to signal level, the subtle nonlinearities that give tape its character.

The same applies to large-format analogue consoles. The summing, the transformers, the circuitry and bus compression all contribute to a sound that has shaped records for decades. Running audio through a real SSL console sounds different to summing the same audio in software — not dramatically, not always obviously, but consistently and in ways that matter on a finished record.

For artists and producers looking for analogue recording in London, understanding what you’re actually getting — and why — is the starting point.


Tape recording at 123 Studios

At the centre of the analogue setup at 123 Studios is a 3M M79 24-track tape machine — the same format used on records by Fleetwood Mac, Led Zeppelin, the Beatles and Michael Jackson.

This particular machine came originally from Pete Townshend’s Eel Pie Studio, which is documented in its logbook. It’s fully maintained and in regular working use — not a display piece.

Tape recording in London at this level means access to a machine with genuine provenance, run by engineers who understand how to use it properly. The difference between tape used well and tape used carelessly is significant.

Alongside the 3M M79, the studio has additional tape machines available, which means sessions can be configured for full multitrack tape recording or for hybrid use — running stems, drums or the mix bus through tape as part of a broader digital workflow.


Analogue vs hybrid workflows — which is right for your project?

A fully analogue session — tracking everything to tape from the start — brings a level of commitment that changes how you work. Performances matter more. Decisions happen earlier. You’re not building something you’ll fix later; you’re capturing something real in the moment.

That’s not right for every project, and it’s not the only way to use analogue tools.

Many artists recording in London choose a hybrid approach that uses analogue where it adds the most value:

  • Tracking drums or the full band to tape for natural compression and cohesion, then continuing digitally
  • Mixing through an analogue console with digital recall, getting the character of the desk without losing the flexibility of a recalled mix
  • Running stems or the mix bus through tape as a mastering or mix insert, adding saturation and density at the end of the chain

The point isn’t purity. It’s using the right tool for what the music needs. At 123 Studios, both approaches are available and the choice is made based on the project, not ideology.


The SSL E-Series console

The control room is built around a vintage SSL E-Series console — one of the most significant mixing desks in the history of recorded music, known for its clarity, punch and workflow.

With dynamics on every channel and the characteristic SSL mix bus compression, the desk shapes the sound from the moment audio passes through it. The SSL isn’t a passive piece of routing — it’s an active part of the sound.

Paired with ATC SCM50ASL monitoring, the setup is designed for accuracy. What you hear in the control room translates reliably to streaming platforms, broadcast, car stereos and headphones. That matters for every record, but especially for analogue recordings where the character of the signal chain needs to sit right in the final mix.

The outboard rack at 123 Studios includes Fairchild and Unfairchild compressors, 1176s, LA-2As, Distressors, API 2500, Pultec EQs, Chandler Curve Bender, and Neve and API preamps — tools chosen for musicality and used across the full range of session types the studio handles.


The microphone collection

A strong analogue signal chain starts at the microphone. The locker at 123 Studios includes Neumann U47, U67, ELAM 251, M49, FET47, KM84 and U87, alongside RCA/AEA 44 ribbon microphones and a full range of dynamic and specialist mics.

For analogue recording in London, access to this level of microphone collection — particularly the vintage Neumann valve mics — makes a significant difference. These are instruments in their own right, and the difference between tracking vocals through a U47 and a budget condenser is not subtle.


Who analogue recording in London is right for

Analogue recording isn’t essential for every project, and it’s worth being honest about that.

If you’re producing entirely electronically, working with samples, or need maximum flexibility in post-production, a fully digital workflow may serve you better. There’s no point introducing tape into a process where it doesn’t add value.

But analogue becomes the right choice when:

  • You’re recording a live band and want the room, the performance and the gear to work together rather than everything being assembled afterwards
  • You want natural compression and saturation built into the recording rather than added later
  • You prefer committing to sounds during the session rather than endlessly adjusting them in the edit
  • You want a record that sounds like it was made somewhere, by someone, rather than assembled from components

For many artists, the shift to analogue recording isn’t about abandoning digital tools — it’s about adding depth, intention and character to a process that can otherwise become frictionless in ways that don’t always serve the music.


Recording, mixing and mastering in one place

123 Studios is set up as a complete production environment for artists who want to take a project from tracking through to final masters without changing rooms, engineers or sonic context.

Full-band tracking and overdubs are handled in the live room — high ceilings, warm wooden walls, adjustable ceiling cloud, electronic Drumbrella and backline included. The control room handles mixing through the SSL console with the full outboard chain. Mastering is done in-house, with tape mastering available as an option.

Having recording, mixing and mastering in one place means the sound decisions made during tracking inform the mix, and the mix informs the master. That continuity is harder to maintain when different stages happen in different rooms with different engineers.


About Brett Shaw

123 Studios is built around the work of Brett Shaw — producer, mixer, mastering engineer and songwriter. Credits include Florence + the Machine, Foals, Clean Bandit, Daughter and Paris Paloma, with over 5.5 billion streams worldwide, four UK number one albums and a Grammy-winning single. Ranked top 1% globally across production, mixing, mastering, engineering and songwriting by MusoAI.

Weekend and evening recording sessions are run by engineers selected by Brett, working in the same room with the same setup and standards.


Rates and booking

Recording sessions at 123 Studios start from £300 + VAT per day, including engineer, backline and full microphone access. Tape recording is available within standard session rates — there’s no additional hire fee for using the machines.

Mastering starts from £50 per track including one free set of revisions. Tape mastering is available for an additional £10 per track.

For mixing enquiries, long-term room lets or to discuss a specific project, email brettshaw123@outlook.com


Getting to 123 Studios

123 Studios is located at Unit 4.2, Copeland Park, 133 Copeland Road, Peckham, London SE15 3SN — one minute from Peckham Rye Overground station, around fifteen minutes from Shoreditch High Street. Parking is available nearby with easy load-in access to the building.


FAQs — analogue recording in London

Is tape recording more expensive than digital recording at 123 Studios? No. Tape recording is available within standard session rates. There is no additional charge for using the tape machines during a tracking session.

Do I have to commit to a fully analogue workflow? No. Hybrid sessions are common — you might track to tape and mix digitally, or use tape as an insert on the mix bus. The approach is determined by what suits the project.

What tape machines does 123 Studios have? The studio has a 3M M79 24-track machine, originally from Pete Townshend’s Eel Pie Studio, plus additional tape machines for hybrid and insert use.

Can I book 123 Studios just for mixing or mastering? Yes. Many clients bring sessions tracked elsewhere for mixing and mastering at 123 Studios. As long as your files are organised and exported correctly, the studio can take over from any point in the process.

Where is 123 Studios? Copeland Park, 133 Copeland Road, Peckham, London SE15 3SN. One minute from Peckham Rye Overground.